<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clean Elections agency promotes itself at taxpayers&#8217; expense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whatiknow.freedomblogging.com/2007/10/26/clean-elections-agency-promotes-itself-at-taxpayers-expense/37/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whatiknow.freedomblogging.com/2007/10/26/clean-elections-agency-promotes-itself-at-taxpayers-expense/37/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 06:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Craig Dunkerley</title>
		<link>http://whatiknow.freedomblogging.com/2007/10/26/clean-elections-agency-promotes-itself-at-taxpayers-expense/37/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Dunkerley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 00:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatiknow.freedomblogging.com/2007/10/26/clean-elections-agency-promotes-itself-at-taxpayers-expense/#comment-20</guid>
		<description>I haven't heard the ads so maybe the quality is as as poor as you say, but generally speaking I think the idea of promoting public awareness of public financing and how it makes government more accountable to voters instead of big campaign donors is a good thing. A lot of people still don't understand public financing and how it benefits them. That makes them vulnerable to disinformation from well organized and well funded critics who try to undermine the program. And maybe the poor quality of the ads is evidence that they're actually not spending that much after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t heard the ads so maybe the quality is as as poor as you say, but generally speaking I think the idea of promoting public awareness of public financing and how it makes government more accountable to voters instead of big campaign donors is a good thing. A lot of people still don&#8217;t understand public financing and how it benefits them. That makes them vulnerable to disinformation from well organized and well funded critics who try to undermine the program. And maybe the poor quality of the ads is evidence that they&#8217;re actually not spending that much after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
