<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Appeals court could be right in banning school vouchers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whatiknow.freedomblogging.com/2008/05/15/appeals-court-could-be-right-in-banning-school-vouchers/143/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whatiknow.freedomblogging.com/2008/05/15/appeals-court-could-be-right-in-banning-school-vouchers/143/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 09:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: SY</title>
		<link>http://whatiknow.freedomblogging.com/2008/05/15/appeals-court-could-be-right-in-banning-school-vouchers/143/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>SY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whatiknow.freedomblogging.com/2008/05/15/appeals-court-could-be-right-in-banning-school-vouchers/#comment-563</guid>
		<description>Funding  for Private Education should be borne by its Beneficiaries and not by disinterested parties.  Proponents of Vouchers would subsidize private (parochial) schools via the tax base...contrary to The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.  Public Policy would be ill-served by such an arrangement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funding  for Private Education should be borne by its Beneficiaries and not by disinterested parties.  Proponents of Vouchers would subsidize private (parochial) schools via the tax base&#8230;contrary to The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.  Public Policy would be ill-served by such an arrangement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
