Archive for November, 2008
November 16th, 2008, 8:04 pm by Le Templar
 Barrett Marson Tribune writer Mary K. Reinhart’s in-depth profile Sunday of Kirk Adams, the next speaker of the Arizona House of Representatives, revealed the answer to a question being tossed around by journalists and public relations officials alike: Is Barrett Marson in or out as the spokesman for House Republicans? Marson won’t be part of the new administration as Adams looks to replace all of the top staff members from the Jim Weiers administration.
“We’re making a clean break,” Adams told Reinhart. ”This is a good time, especially for Republicans.”
Marson has been the House communications director for more than three years, serving as Weiers’ voice to the media and writing press releases for other House Republicans as well. Marson could be annoyingly aggressive as he tried to get traditional media and bloggers to cover an issue that he believed made his bosses look good or would embarrass Weiers’ most potent foe — Gov. Janet Napolitano. But Marson is generally well-liked for his sense of humor, and always has respected the role of journalists in the politcal system even when some lawmakers didn’t. He also gained extra attention earlier this year during his one-on-one debates with state Democratic Party spokeswoman Emily DeRose on “Horizon,” the local news issues PBS show.
Still, elected leaders who defeat an incumbent, as Adams did with Weiers, typically want new key advisors who don’t have close ties to the prior administration.
A former award-winning print reporter, Marson cover state politics for several years for the Tribune and then the Arizona Daily Star. In 2001, he broke the story of then-Gov. Jane Dee Hull’s frequent weekend flights in a state-owned airplane to stay at her cabin retreat in the White Mountains. That story helped to shape a rather negative image of Hull during her final two years in office.
Posted in: Arizona Legislature • Governor • Arizona House of Representatives • Barrett Marson • Jim Weiers • Kirk Adams | 5 Comments »
November 14th, 2008, 2:02 pm by Le Templar
Graphic illustration by Gabriel Utasi/Tribune
The editorial board of Arizona State University’s student newspaper, the State Press, apparently didn’t like the Tribune’s suggestion that the Arizona Board of Regents postpone any further increases in student tuition or classroom fees for at least one year. The State Press responded with an editorial Thursday that says the Tribune is well-intended but ill-informed, because regents have no choice but to keep raising tuition because the Legislature steadfastly refuses to properly fund the universities.
I can’t say I’m surprised by the State Press editorial. Students attending public colleges routinely believe elected officials don’t understand the importance of such institutions, and so they divert tax dollars to purposes of far less value. I certainly believed that 20 years ago when I was attending the University of Wyoming, and made the exact same argument as the State Press in a column for that campus’ student newspaper.
But the facts are the Arizona Board of Regents has increased tuition and other fees at a rate higher than inflation throughout this decade, while the Legislature has funded student population growth during most of those years. Lawmakers have failed to provide enough funding for building construction and maintenance during the good years. But the universities have made their own mistakes, such as when ASU failed to install enough fire sprinklers when it remodeled the Memorial Union.
Arguments about class sizes being too big or not getting the right professor ring hollow when more students can no longer afford to enroll at a public university in first place, or they have to ring up so much debt that their lives are heavily burdened for years after graduation.
And there’s another issue to consider. Capitol Media Services reported in today’s Tribune that some lawmakers are looking to grab the money that the three universities expect to bring in from this year’s tuition increases. So postponing any additional increases for a year is unlikely to harm the universities, but would be a boon for students in a tough economy and might ease growing tensions between the board of regents and the Legislature.
Posted in: Arizona Legislature • Arizona government • Schools • Tempe • Arizona Board of Regents • Arizona State University • State Press • University of Wyoming | Post a Comment »
November 13th, 2008, 11:56 am by Le Templar
REP. JEFF FLAKE IN HIS CONGRESSIONAL OFFICE. (Original photo at americanradioworks.publicradio.org.)
In the aftermath of widespread Republican defeats in this year’s federal elections, Arizona’s own Jeff Flake keeps popping up among a small list of names that party activists and conservative pundits believe are now the future of the GOP. After a Nov. 5 column in the Washington Post, he’s being talked about by everyone from random bloggers to prominent political sites. One Web site even polled 42 conservative bloggers about their favorite Republicans and Flake came in ninth.
Flake’s rise to national prominence continues Friday when he takes part in the 40th anniversary celebration of Reason Foundation, the Los Angeles-based libertarian think tank that sponsors Reason Magazine and Reason.TV. Flake will be the keynote speaker at a Hollywood gala banquet emceed by comedian and “Price is Right” host Drew Carey. It’s safe to say one of these two guys is probably the reason that the banquet and the related two-day conference have been sold out for weeks.
By chance, the Reason Foundation’s top award, “The Flame of Freedom,” will be awarded to two couples — R. David and Judith Threshie and Richard A. and Patricia Wallace. These people have been prominent leaders of Freedom Communications, the Tribune’s parent company, and active supporters of Reason as well. David Threshie is the Freedom board chairman emeritus and a former publisher of the Orange County Register. Richard Wallace recently retired as Freedom vice president of corporate affairs. Judith Threshie and Patricia Wallace are two granddaughters of company founder R.C. Hoiles, and have been active in the family partnership that ultimately owns the private company.
Posted in: Freedom of Information • Libertarian values • Drew Carey • Freedom Communications • Jeff Flake • Reason Foundation | Post a Comment »
November 12th, 2008, 3:17 pm by Le Templar
JEFF FLAKE
Back before the Sept 2 primaries, I wrote a blog post about why it didn’t really matter which of two Democrats emerged to challenge Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., as neither one had raised any money for their campaigns while Flake was sitting on pile of cash. If you read the comments under that post, you’ll note I took quite bit of criticism for suggesting that advertising funds and name recognition have far more influence over election campaigns than ideas, character, values or any of the other issues that voters are supposed to weigh.
Well, with the vote counting nearly over, Democrat Rebecca Schneider stuck to her principles in the 6th Congressional District, but failed to make any sort of impression in the general election. Through Oct. 15, Schneider had raised only $4,900 compared to Flake’s $1.2 million. That lopsided advantage was reflected on election day as Flake had the largest margin of victory among Arizona’s Republican candidates elected to Congress. This includes not only the percentage of votes cast (62.5 percent for Flake vs. 34.5 percent for Schneider) but also the difference in voting totals (191,540 for Flake vs. 105,862 for Schneider as of today, for a gap of about 85,300 votes). Arizona’s senior congressmen, Democrat Ed Pastor of Phoenix, defeated his largely unknown Republican opponent with 72 percent of the vote in the 4th Congressional District. But his winning margin was only about 56,300 votes.
I mentioned in my original post the difficult cycle that exists between money and federal candidates. You have to raise a good sum of money to get serious attention (at least a million dollars in Arizona); but you have to be taken seriously in order to raise that kind of money. A lot of people don’t like that, which is one big reason behind the push for publicly funded campaigns. But the federal courts appeared headed to ruling such systems unconstitutional if they force, coerce or intimidate any candidate into participating instead of running with private donations.
Posted in: Congress • 6th Congressional District • Jeff Flake • Rebecca Schneider | Post a Comment »
November 11th, 2008, 1:39 pm by Le Templar
MEMBERS OF THE DOBSON HIGH SCHOOL ROTC PROGRAM MARCHED TODAY IN MESA’S VETERANS DAY PARADE. (Photo by Tony D’Astoli/Tribune)
The organizers of Mesa’s Veterans Day Parade never have enjoyed the same level of support as their counterparts in Phoenix or Tempe — even when the city of Mesa picked up all of the costs of closing streets, providing traffic control and cleaning up afterward. After the city cut off public funding three years ago because of budget constraints, those organizers have struggled just to keep the event alive. This year, veterans groups were worried because they had raised enough private donations to pay for the parade, but not enough for advertising to invite the public to attend.
After watching today’s parade in downtown Mesa, I’d say those worries were overblown and patriotism is alive and well here. A good crowd filled in both sides of Center Street to clap, cheer and salute as veterans, high school bands and active military rolled by. You can watch a video and a photo slideshow
(Photo by Le Templar)
A high number of entries made for a long parade, another important sign of support. The only downside was large gaps appeared between groups several times, prompting some people to think the parade was over and wander away. Hopefully, organizers can recruit more volunteers next year to keep the parade closer together and lift up everyone’s interest in watching.
(Photo by Le Templar)
For more scenes from the parade, you can watch a Tribune video and a photo slideshow.
Posted in: Mesa • Phoenix • Tempe • Mesa • parade • Veterans Day | 2 Comments »
November 10th, 2008, 12:06 pm by Le Templar
REP. DAVID LUJAN
Last summer, a small group of Valley journalists and people from other careers met at the Tempe Public Library to discuss possible ways to make government more transparent to the public, with an emphasis on freedom of information and open records law.s The meeting was organized by the 21st Century Right-to-Know Project as part of a national listening tour for the purpose of developing proposed policy changes for the incoming new president (whether it turned out to be John McCain or Barack Obama).
While most of the discussion focused on federal agencies, state Rep. David Lujan, D-Ariz., spoke to the group about how Arizona law works and where potential gaps might be. The back-and-forth led to the point that while Arizona has a robust open records’ law that most lawmakers support, the Legislature always has been exempt from obeying it. Lujan noted the irony that the Legislature expects other government agencies to follow a statute that lawmakers won’t impose on themselves.
Lujan pledged before the group to draft and introduce a bill next year that would generally include the Legislature under the open records statute. Now, I wouldn’t expect such a bill to get anywhere. Individual lawmakers and legislative agencies actually are quite good about releasing records and other data from their offices, if only to avoid the appearance of trying to hide something from the public. But a number of lawmakers I’ve talked to don’t believe the open records law should apply to the Legislature, to protect those rare instances in which they choose not to share anything. They see such a law as intruding on the constitutional authority of individual lawmakers as elected officeholders (even though the same law already applies to county board of supervisors and city councils).
What’s interesting here is House Democrats decided last week to name Lujan as their new leader, replacing Phil Lopes of Tucson. So if Lujan keeps his pledge, he could give more visibility to a bill that requires the Arizona Legislature to release its records, instead of simply trusting lawmakers to do so.
Posted in: Arizona Legislature • Arizona government • Freedom of Information • Arizona Legislature • David Lujan • right to know | Post a Comment »
November 7th, 2008, 4:57 pm by Le Templar
I am surprised I haven’t read more this week about how much Barack Obama owes his victory in the presidential race to Howard Dean, chairman of the Democratic National Committee. Sure, Obama has charisma, eloquence and a message of hope on his side. But Dean had the vision of how to manage a national campaign involving thousands of ego-driven politicians and prickly volunteers that prepared much of the ground for Obama to walk.
Many Americans remember the former Vermont governor only for the “Iowa scream” that seemed to single-handedly derail his 2004 bid for president (Not true, but that’s how a lot of people recall it). But in that campaign, Dean pioneered a lot of the Internet fund-raising techniques that Obama mastered this year to break all money records for a presidential election.
After Dean took charge of DNC in February 2005, he made two promises: Democrats would take control of Congress in the 2006 elections and the White House in 2008. He said that would be possible only by challenging Republicans directly in traditionally “red” states on issues such as health care, high-paying jobs and alternative energy. He rebuilt the DNC’s spending machine to direct more resources into every state and to specifically target the “Intermountain West” (from Montana to Nevada) because changing demographics meant new voters would be more likely to support Democrats.
In 2006, Dean guided the national party to identify six issues of concern to the entire country and did a remarkable job of convincing individual Democrat candidates to use those issues as the themes of their campaigns. Of course, this strategy was the same concept as Newt Gingrich’s 1994 Contract with America that propelled Republicans into control of Congress for 12 years. The only difference was Dean didn’t try to force every Democrat candidate in every race to commit to the national party’s position on all six issues.
And Dean’s version worked just as effectively. While Democratic gains were expected in 2006 given the unpopularity of the Iraq war, few observers took seriously Dean’s goal of regaining both houses of Congress at once.
As of today, everything has worked out pretty much as Dean said it would, much to the chagrin of Republicans. Dean’s loss to John Kerry in the 2004 primaries might have been the best thing to happen for the Democratic Party since Bill Clinton.
Posted in: Election issues • Barack Obama • Contract with America • Democratic Party • Howard Dean | Post a Comment »
November 6th, 2008, 4:42 pm by Le Templar
REP. KIRK ADAMS SPEAKS WITH STATE CAPITOL REPORTERS THURSDAY AFTER BEING SELECTED BY FELLOW REPUBLICANS TO BE THE NEW HOUSE SPEAKER (Photo by Capitol Media Services).
A fair number of people were unimpressed when I wrote a few weeks ago about Rep. Kirk Adams, R-Mesa, seeking to unseat Rep. Jim Weiers, R-Phoenix, as speaker of the state House of Representatives. Few outsiders I talked to gave Adams any realistic chance of winning the House’s top leadership post, unless Republicans suffered a bloodbath in Tuesday’s election.
Republicans actually did better than expected Tuesday, and they have expanded the number of House seats they control. But Capitol Media Services is reporting that Adams defeated Weiers anyway today in a private meeting of incoming Republican House members.
Among the people who should be thrilled by this news is Gov. Janet Napolitano. She and Weiers have developed a rather intense dislike of one another during her six years in office. Napolitano and her Democratic allies tried both in 2006 and this year to knock Weiers out of the House with candidate challenges in his home district. But they failed.
While Adams isn’t any closer to Napolitano philosophically, he’s more likely to have an on-going working relationship with her — if she doesn’t leave Arizona for Washington, D.C., for a post in Barack Obama’s presidential administration.
Here’s Capitol Media Services’ first report:
House Republicans ousted speaker Jim Weiers on Thursday, choosing a Mesa lawmaker who promised a more effective effort to enact `”good Republican policy.” And that, said Kirk Adams, means adopting Republican budgets — budgets that have less spending and are actually balanced against revenues, “not one that has a $1.2 billion hole in the moment that it’s passed.”
Adams said he believes he — and the other Republicans — have a mandate from voters to pursue those policies by virtue of the fact that it appears that the GOP picked up two seats in the 60-member chamber. That gives them a 35-25 edge over Democrats. The lifelong Arizona resident said he is not planning to exclude the minority Democrats.
“They certainly should have a voice and it should be an open and transparent process,” he said.
“It should be respectful of everybody’s opinion,” Adams continued. “But at the end of the day, when we vote on those
bills or we vote on the budget, we also need to respect the will of the voters.”
And Adams said that shift occurred “in a year, in a country, where it wasn’t a good year for Republicans anywhere else, except perhaps in the Arizona Legislature.”
Posted in: Arizona Legislature • Governor • Gov. Janet Napolitano • House Speaker • Jim Weiers • Kirk Adams | Post a Comment »
November 5th, 2008, 10:04 am by Le Templar
GOV. JANET NAPOLITANO SPOKE IN JANUARY ON BEHALF OF FELLOW DEMOCRAT BARACK OBAMA, WHO IS NOW PRESIDENT-ELECT (Capitol Media Services file photo).
The countdown clock has begun on how long it takes President-Elect Barack Obama to name Arizona’s own Gov. Janet Napolitano to a Cabinet post. Unlike the presidential race of 2004, Napolitano backed a Democrat relatively early in this year’s primary season and her gamble has paid off. Just about everyone involved in Arizona politics expects Napolitano to be tabbed for a prominent position such as attorney general or homeland security secretary.
My only hestitation is Napolitano didn’t deliver Arizona to Obama either in the primaries or the general election. In fact, Sen. John McCain won his home state by a larger-than-expected margin. So there might be less pressure on Obama to offer Napolitano a critical position in his administration.
On the other hand, given that Arizona’s governor will face a nightmarish budget and a more conservative, Republican-controlled Legislature next year, Napolitano might be happy to accept even an obscure post in Washington, D.C.
Posted in: Arizona government • Governor • Barack Obama • Janet Napolitano • president-elect | 2 Comments »
November 4th, 2008, 10:29 pm by Le Templar
During his concession speech tonight, John McCain hinted we might not see him any more on the campaign trail.
“Campaigns are often harder on a candidate’s family than on the candidate,” McCain said. “That has been true in this campaign. All I can offer in compensation is my love and gratitude and the promise of more peaceful years ahead.”
Is this a signal that McCain won’t seek re-election in 2010? If so, expect a wealth of politicians to line up for the rare opportunity of an open Senate seat.
Posted in: Uncategorized | Post a Comment »
|
|
Twitter