Search: Web        
powered by
Le Templar: What I Know ~

Archive for April, 2009

Obama actually gets better honor from ASU

April 13th, 2009, 11:26 am by Le Templar

crowmichaelweb

I have to hand it to Arizona State University President Michael Crow. He needed something innovative and meaningful for President Barack Obama, and Crow needed it quick, as the initial criticism for refusing Obama an honorary degree had escalated into a national avalanche in just 24 hours.

And Crow managed to come up with an honor for Obama when the president speaks to ASU graduates on May 13 that will matter more than in the long run. It will just take a while for Crow and the rest of the ASU administration to remove the egg on their faces.

As Tribune writer Ryan Gabrielson reported Saturday, Crow decided to rename one of ASU’s biggest scholarship programs for Obama. Currently called ASU Advantage, the state-funded scholarships covers most of the costs of attending the university (tuition and fees, text books, room and board) for every freshman from Arizona whose family makes less than $25,000 a year. The scholarships are funded, in part, by those tuition hikes that ASU and the Arizona Board of Regents have approved in the past few years.

The mission of these scholarships, tapping the dollars of wealthier residents to support the education of those with fewer means, certain fits Obama’s governing philosophy. My guess is Obama will be rather pleased with the notion of hundreds or thousands of ASU students associating their free-ride college years with his name. It’s an honor far better than a pretend doctorate that would be tossed into a trunk with all of those other pieces of fancy paper he’s likely to receive from various groups in the next four years.

Of course, it would be far easier to see the scholarship renaming as an honor if ASU had made such an announcement before The Associated Press disclosed that an academic committee had decided Obama doesn’t deserve an honorary doctorate because he hasn’t been in office long enough.

Crow had to rush out the decision over the weekend after the AP story inspired the Tribune editorial on Thursday, which in turn was picked up by political blogs across the country that just skewered Crow and ASU. By Friday morning, Crow already was working on some way to stop the furor before it irretrievably damaged local enthusiasm about Obama’s May appearance.

By Friday evening, the Arizona Guardian web site was quoting Board of Regents member Fred DuVal as saying Obama would get an honorary degree after all. But I found that hard to believe, as that move would been a huge insult to the academic committee and would have detracted from whatever credibility this type of honor usually offers.

So Crow came up with a better alternative. I expect someone will question why a prominent scholarship program is to be permanently named for someone who has no direct ties to ASU or Arizona. But Obama supporters can no longer claim he’s been slighted by ASU.

Counting the ways to cut K-12 education

April 8th, 2009, 11:16 am by Le Templar

atralogo

A couple of people have asked me how the Arizona Legislature can consider significant cuts to K-12 education, as much as $341 million according to versions of Republican leadership proposals leaked to the media and education advocates in late March. The question isn’t about the potential impact on local school districts, but in light of the protections of Proposition 301 that were part of the legislation authorizing a higher statewide sales tax and approved by voters in 2000.

As understood at the time, the Legislature is supposed to not only reject any cuts to basic state aid to K-12 school districts but raise state funding by 2 percent each year. However, the specific language of the law seems to allow lawmakers to modify or ignore the 2 percent increase.

But actually reducing the total amount of state funding, wasn’t that illegal? The answer is “no,” as the state provides money beyond basic state aid in a number of ways, none of which apparently are covered by Proposition 301.

The Arizona Tax Research Association has provided the Legislature with a detailed explanation of what kind of cuts can be made. Many of ATRA’s proposals (which now has been formally endorsed by the Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry)  show up in the Republican list. But ATRA has identified a total of $529 million in potential K-12 cuts, or about $200 million more than offered so far in the most conservative budget proposal.

This means lawmakers continue to use a lighter hand when it comes to education cuts. And most people believe the Legislature won’t adopt the entire $341 million in reductions either, because the political opposition is just too strong.

Arizona counties get high marks for open government

April 7th, 2009, 10:54 am by Le Templar

A libertarian-oriented group out of Chicago that focuses on freedom of information and watchdog advocacy says Arizona’s 15 counties are the best in the United States when it comes to posting vital details about government operations on the Internet.

The 2-year-old Sam Adams Alliance maintains a wiki site called the Sunshine Review, which seeks to track how quickly state and local governments are moving into the 21st century by posting public records on-line so people can monitor government spending around the clock. On Monday, the Sunshine Review posted a state-by-state comparison of counties, boroughs and parishes, and Arizona came out on top.

Efforts by Arizona’s counties to keep the public informed are mixed, according to the comparison. Arizona ranks well for Internet postings of current budgets (100 percent), tax rates and other government fees (94 percent), and names of top administrators and their email addresses (93 percent). But Arizona’s counties do a much poorer job of posting contracts of more than $10,000 (54 percent) and of listing which officials people should contact to request public records (47 percent). And apparently none of the counties spell out what kind of lobbying associations they belong to and how much they spend on lobbying.

Overall, Arizona receives a grade of 65.5 percent, which doesn’t sound that good at all. It’s closest competitors include California at 64.35 percent and Florida at 56.28 percent. The bottom states include Arkansas and Mississippi. Oddly, three states (Vermont, Rhode Island and Connecticut) received grades of zero percent because they aren’t organized into counties.

Another way to view Arizona’s record on open government and the Internet came during Sunshine Week in March. A survey of state records posted online found Arizona offers Internet access in 14 of 20 specific categories. That was good enough to land at 10th best among the 50 states. (The list includes Arizona a second time with 13 of 20 categories. I have asked for clarification from Sunshine Week’s national coordinator).

Arizona produces great highway bureaucrats

April 6th, 2009, 11:01 am by Le Templar


VICTOR MENDEZ (LEFT) AND MARY PETERS, FORMER DIRECTORS OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, HAVE GONE ON TO PROMINENT ROLES IN MANAGING FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION POLICIES.

So, how does it feel to live in the state with the best highway and transportation department in the country? That definitely one possible conclusion to draw from last week’s announcement by the White House that Arizona’s Victor Mendez has been nominated as the next director of the Federal Highway Administration. Mendez just finished a six-year stint as director of the Arizona Department of Transportation, where he rose through the ranks as a highway planner to manage the multi-billion dollar freeway construction program for the Valley that was launched in 1985.

Mendez’s predecessor at ADOT, Mary Peters, also spent decades at that agency until she served as director under governors Fife Symington and Jane Dee Hull. Then, Peters became the U.S. transportation secretary (overseeing the Federal Highway Administration) during President George W. Bush’s second term.

Peters was selected by the Bush White House in part because of its close relationship with Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., who in turn long has been a big fan of Peters. And I’m guessing Janet Napolitano, who worked closely with Mendez while she was Arizona governor, had a substantial say in Mendez’s selection for the federal highway post.

At least one huge difference between Mendez and Peters: he’s still more of a professional bureaucrat while she’s evolved into a politician with strong Republican ties. Peters would like to be governor, and in fact would have run in 2006, except her decision to register to vote in Virginia while transportation secretary made a campaign too difficult to launch. However, the Federal Highway Administration post certainly involves a higher level of politics, so Mendez could have new doors open for him if he’s interested and handles the job well.

Meanwhile, I wonder if there’s any weird pressure on Gov. Jan Brewer’s selection to replace Mendez at ADOT, John Halikowski. Should he be aiming for a potential job with the next Republican president?

Thomas can take satisfaction in Serial Shooter convictions

April 1st, 2009, 12:44 pm by Le Templar


MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY ANDREW THOMAS (Tribune file photo)

The media (neither mainstream or Internet era) usually don’t take the time to remark or offer praise when a politician simply does his or her job. But Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas has been a lightning rod of controversy in the past two years, and he has brought at least some of his troubles upon himself. So a source made a good point today when I was asked if anyone was going to recognize the work of Thomas and his staff in obtaining multiple death penalty sentences for one of the high-profile killers in the Serial Shooter case. Even if Dale Hausner could somehow prevent state execution, he’s never going to leave prison as a free man.

Thomas and the Phoenix Police Department took some risks when they investigated and then arrested Hausner and partner Samuel Dieteman. Uncertain if they had collected enough evidence yet to get murder convictions, Thomas and Phoenix officials agreed to get the two off the street only a few days after they became suspects in order to prevent additional random killings that had terrorized the entire Valley.

Not only did Thomas’ office build a strong case, some prosecutor managed to convince Dieteman to plead guilty to two murders and then to testify against Hausner, and even though Dieteman can still get the death penalty as well. (Dieteman’s sentencing was delayed until after Hausner’s). In fact, I assume Thomas’ prosecutors will push for a second execution, given that Dieteman was an active, willing participant in the serial shootings who was stopped only by the police handcuffs and jail bars.

I’m impressed these prosecutions didn’t fall victim to Thomas’ re-election campaign last year, his various clashes with the judiciary, or his out-and-out dog fight with the county Board of Supervisors. These two cases proceeded without any unnecessary drama and there was little doubt that Hausner would receive the justice he deserved. This is the kind of attention to safety that the public expects and deserves from a county attorney.

There are many ways that I am concerned about Thomas’ management of the county attorney’s office, the latest being I simply don’t understand how Thomas can argue he has no conflict of interest in prosecuting county Supervior Don Stapley (and by effect, seeking to have Stapley removed from office) while still offering legal advice on other matters to Stapley and the rest of the board.

But when it comes to the Serial Shooter case, Thomas and his staff have done an excellent job.

ADVERTISEMENT