If Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon and Maricopa County Supervisor Mary Rose Wilcox think they can just ignore the new investigative writer for the Goldwater Institute, then they have forgotten who Mark Flatten is. Especially Wilcox, as Flatten seems to clearly prove she used her political connections to land and keep a lucrative restaurant contract at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, and she violated federal rules while doing so.
Unlike Gordon and Wilcox, I haven’t forgotten Flatten. He was one of the best investigative journalists in the state during his years with the East Valley Tribune, and possibly one of Arizona’s best ever. He’s methodical, relentless and has amazing organizational skills. And he never allows an investigative report to be published until he’s sure he has covered all of the angles.
But given the uncertain future of the Tribune, Flatten decided this summer to strike out on a new venture. In an evolution from the traditional model of political think tanks, the Goldwater Institute hired Flatten to continue pursuing his craft which includes following the ethical tenets of journalism. But many Arizona journalists have wondered if Flatten really would have the freedom to objectively pursue a story to its logical conclusion, or would the Goldwater Institute subtly (or overtly) coerce Flatten’s writing to fit the institute’s libertarian outlook.
I think there’s some evidence for both points of view in Flatten’s first report for the institute — a detailed looked at the process of providing access to Sky Harbor concessions contracts for minority-owned and disadvantaged businesses. Goldwater Institute was an early advocate for a proposed state law that would end race-based preferences in government contracts and other policies. Flatten makes clear the proposed law, which the Legislature has asked state voters to consider in November 2010, played some role in inspiring his report.
But Flatten’s investigative work also shines through, especially when it comes to Wilcox. In a nutshell, Flatten reports Wilcox got a sweetheart deal to gain 30 percent ownership of a Chili’s restaurant at Sky Harbor. The master airport contractor who owns 70 percent of the restaurant used the fact that Wilcox is a Hispanic woman to help the contractor meet Phoenix’s minority-ownership rules. In return, Wilcox didn’t have put any money into the business for her 30 percent and she doesn’t have any clearly defined role in operating the restaurant, both of which are a violation of rules from the Federal Aviation Administration, Flatten reported.
Wilcox flat-out refused to answer any questions from Flatten, claiming he was delving into a private business matter. Huh? Wilcox is making money from a taxpayer-funded airport that’s heavily regulated by various governments, and she’s an long-time elected public servant. But she wants to claim privacy? Ridiculous.
Gordon and most administrators at the airport refused substantive interviews with Flatten as well. That might possibly might make more sense, as the Goldwater Institute has been suing that city in a separate, high-profile case. To Gordon’s credit, he gave definite, if brief, answers when Flatten tracked him down for a walking hallway interview. (”No. No, sir,” was about Gordon had to say.)
But Flatten refused to allow those closed doors to stop him. He dug through contracts, email and thousands of other public records to get the story. The great thing about the Internet is some of the most important records are posted with links embedded right into the Goldwater Institute report. So we don’t just have to take Flatten’s word on what he found, we can read the evidence for ourselves.
We continue to miss Flatten here at the Tribune. But it’s great to see that he’s still serving the public by uncovering flaws and undue political influence in government.



Mary Rose Wilcox violating rules? C’mon, really?
Wasn’t she the same individual that bulldozed down an historic property in Phoenix (in complete violation of their rules) to offer more parking to her restaurant located next to it?
Wasn’t she the same individual that completely ignored the overwhelming view of the public and voted to use taxpayer money to build Bank One Ballpark?
Yet she gets away with this (and many more ethical issues) because she’s hispanic and no local politician (especially Mayor Phil-berto) has the ethical kahunas to call her on it.
Go get her, Mark. Here’s to hoping she (and any other dirty politician) gets there upcoming soon. It’s way past time.
I agree. Go get her and nail her to the wall.
Can anybody shed any light into what these citations she received from Phoenix PD are for??*****PCP20049042013 12/15/2004 CRIMINAL / PPD41053248, 5/20/2005 Non Crimin/ PPD41057438 9/15/2005 Non Crimin/ PPD43052110 8/31/2006 Non Crimin/ PPD22094203 10/2/2007 Non Crimin / PPD46060969 4/30/2008 Non Crimin / PPD44062731 7/8/2008 Non Crimin / PPD43072622 4/6/2009 Non Crimin / PPD45077019 7/6/2009 Non Crimin
Also, how about these her hubby Earl has gotten over the years??Citation: PCP20049042012 12/15/2004 CRIMINAL / CT2009-152286 File Date: 3/9/2009 Type: Civil Traffic / CT2009-559977 File Date: 9/15/2009 Type: Civil Traffic / CT2009-152286 File Date: 3/9/2009 Type: Civil Traffic / PPD13450388 9/6/2005 FAILURE TO STOP AT STOP SIGN PPD13450388 FAIL TO PRODUCE EVIDENCE OF FIN. RESP. / Citation#PPD13559824 11/1/2006 FAIL TO PRODUCE EVIDENCE OF FIN. RESP / Citation#S00087730 11/18/2001 EXCEED SPEED LIMIT BY 20mph in a 45 MPH / S00087730 FAIL TO CARRY VEHICLE REGISTRATION CARD / S00087730 3 FAIL TO PRODUCE EVIDENCE OF FINANCIAL RESP / Citation# C00046483 11/30/2003 SPEED GREATER THAN REASONABLE AND PRUDENT
Sounds to me like Mary Rose thinks she is GOD and above the law. She needs to be taken down.
Don’t forget Earl’s infamous “Get that G*d damned flashlight out of my face” DUI stop.
ITS ABOUT TIME THE UNTOUCHABLE MARYROSE WILCUX? FINALLY MAYBE GETTING THEIR DUES FROM REAL AMERICANS THANK GOODNESS. THIS IS WAY OVERDUE JUST A SUGGESTION ? GIVEUP HER AND HUSBANDS AMERICAN CITIZENSHIP IF THEY ARE AMERICAN? AND RETURN TO THE LAND AND PEOPLE SHE LOVES NOT TO EVER RETURN? GOOD SOLUTION EVERYBODY CONCERNED MIGHT END UP HAPPY? YES ?NO?MAYBE?