Search: Web        
powered by
Le Templar: What I Know ~

Archive for the 'Goldwater Institute' Tag

County supervisor caught violating federal rules, report says

October 14th, 2009, 10:57 am by Le Templar
Mark Flatten/Tribune file

Mark Flatten/Tribune file

If Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon and Maricopa County Supervisor Mary Rose Wilcox think they can just ignore the new investigative writer for the Goldwater Institute, then they have forgotten who Mark Flatten is. Especially Wilcox, as Flatten seems to clearly prove she used her political connections to land and keep a lucrative restaurant contract at Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport, and she violated federal rules while doing so.

Unlike Gordon and Wilcox, I haven’t forgotten Flatten. He was one of the best investigative journalists in the state during his years with the East Valley Tribune, and possibly one of Arizona’s best ever. He’s methodical, relentless and has amazing organizational skills. And he never allows an investigative report to be published until he’s sure he has covered all of the angles.

But given the uncertain future of the Tribune, Flatten decided this summer to strike out on a new venture. In an evolution from the traditional model of political think tanks, the Goldwater Institute hired Flatten to continue pursuing his craft which includes following the ethical tenets of journalism. But many Arizona journalists have wondered if Flatten really would have the freedom to objectively pursue a story to its logical conclusion, or would the Goldwater Institute subtly (or overtly) coerce Flatten’s writing to fit the institute’s libertarian outlook.

I think there’s some evidence for both points of view in Flatten’s first report for the institute — a detailed looked at the process of providing access to Sky Harbor concessions contracts for minority-owned and disadvantaged businesses. Goldwater Institute was an early advocate for a proposed state law that would end race-based preferences in government contracts and other policies. Flatten makes clear the proposed law, which the Legislature has asked state voters to consider in November 2010, played some role in inspiring his report.

But Flatten’s investigative work also shines through, especially when it comes to Wilcox. In a nutshell, Flatten reports Wilcox got a sweetheart deal to gain 30 percent ownership of a Chili’s restaurant at Sky Harbor. The master airport contractor who owns 70 percent of the restaurant used the fact that Wilcox is a Hispanic woman to help the contractor meet Phoenix’s minority-ownership rules. In return, Wilcox didn’t have put any money into the business for her 30 percent and she doesn’t have any clearly defined role in operating the restaurant, both of which are a violation of rules from the Federal Aviation Administration, Flatten reported.

Wilcox flat-out refused to answer any questions from Flatten, claiming he was delving into a private business matter. Huh? Wilcox is making money from a taxpayer-funded airport that’s heavily regulated by various governments, and she’s an long-time elected public servant. But she wants to claim privacy? Ridiculous.

Gordon and most administrators at the airport refused substantive interviews with Flatten as well. That might possibly might make more sense, as the Goldwater Institute has been suing that city in a separate, high-profile case. To Gordon’s credit, he gave definite, if brief, answers when Flatten tracked him down for a walking hallway interview. (”No. No, sir,” was about Gordon had to say.)

But Flatten refused to allow those closed doors to stop him. He dug through contracts, email and thousands of other public records to get the story. The great thing about the Internet is some of the most important records are posted with links embedded right into the Goldwater Institute report. So we don’t just have to take Flatten’s word on what he found, we can read the evidence for ourselves.

We continue to miss Flatten here at the Tribune. But it’s great to see that he’s still serving the public by uncovering flaws and undue political influence in government.

Ariz. students surpass Okla. in civics

September 28th, 2009, 1:27 pm by Le Templar
Matthew Ladner

Matthew Ladner

A while back, I mentioned a survey of high school students by the Goldwater Institute that used civics questions from the standard U.S. citizenship test. The survey found 96.5 percent of the students couldn’t get a passing score (although students at private schools fared substantially better than those at public schools). Now, the Goldwater Institute’s Matthew Ladner offers a sliver of hope about those results.

Another conservative think tank in Oklahoma was intrigued by the Goldwater Institute experiment and wanted to try it on students in Sooner country. So that think tank used the same set of questions for its own telephone survey and had Ladner write up the results: 97.2 of all Oklahoma students couldn’t pass the test to become U.S. citizens (if they were foreign immigrants).

Keep in mind, the questions are about basic U.S. history and government organization — topics that, in theory, should be known to every literate American. And the answers should be fresh on the minds of high school students since they should have studied those topics recently.

The natural inclination is to blame the U.S. education system. But I suspect the problem really lies in a culture that values instant gratification and knowledge by Wikipedia and Google instead of institutional memory and personal exploration with the bedrock principles of U.S. civics.

Arizona constitution shines among the 50 states

September 17th, 2009, 12:08 pm by Le Templar
Nick Dranias/Goldwater Institute

Nick Dranias/Goldwater Institute

In honor of Constitution Week, the Goldwater Institute has released report that compares the 50 state constitutions to what we usually consider the gold standard. As Goldwater is a think tank devoted to the philosophy of limited government and economic freedom, report author Nick Dranias naturally reviews the state constitutions from that perspective.

In “50 Bright Stars,” Dranias concludes nearly every state has a fundamental document that offers more protections for civic rights and more restrictions on the scope and power of government than is described in the U.S. Constitution or as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court. The state constitutions that shine the brightest for freedom are found in Arizona, Alabama, Tennessee and Idaho, Dranias concludes after combining his own analysis with the Mercatus Center’s economic freedom study.

In fact, Arizona ranks first in one of Dranias’ charts that factors in 10 different benchmarks for a classic constitutional republic. That result might be bit of home state bias, as Arizona’s actual score based on Dranias’ analysis was matched by Florida and Louisiana.

Before we puff up our chests too much, Dranias has one, giant caveat — neither state or federal governments really look anything like the limited structures that were envisioned by the framers of the U.S. Constitution in 1787:

“In a very real sense, Arizonans and the residents
of a handful of other states hold the flame
of liberty in their hands — a flame with the
illumination of a match-light, not a torch.
Whether or not we can keep that flame
alive, grow it, and spread its illumination
across the nation depends critically upon
focusing limited resources where they will
have the greatest impact.”

Coyotes ruling not quite a victory for taxpayers

July 22nd, 2009, 2:18 pm by Le Templar

The Goldwater Institute is claiming it won big Wednesday in its bid to prompt more government transparency in possible taxpayer giveaways to a major-league sports franchise. The institute went to court to compel Glendale to turn over any records related to that city’s attempts to convince a  future owner of the Phoenix Coyotes hockey team to stay at Jobing.com Arena. But the ruling isn’t quite as sweeping as the institute’s news release implies.

Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Edward Burke said Glendale gets to keep secret any documents that touch on the city’s actual negotiations with a potential Coyotes owner, including any possible tax incentives or sweetheart lease deals for use of the hockey arena. Burke has demanded that Glendale bring him those records the city wants to keep secret, so he can make sure the city isn’t trying to hide documents that really should be public now. But I doubt the records released at this point will give outsiders any idea of what Glendale has been up to in these private negotiations.

The best part of Burke’s ruling is Glendale has to release all negotiation documents as soon as the city schedules a proposal for the council to publicly consider, or when any ownership bids are filed in U.S. Bankruptcy Court.  That means the judge will protect negotiation privacy only until the talks appear to be over, and then the public gets immediate access to records that might shed more light on what has been going on. Even then, Glendale won’t have to turn over records that reveal how much the city was willing to spend to complete a deal.

The outcome isn’t perfect, but at least a variety of records likely will be available for review in time for taxpayers to influence what Glendale does before the city  signs any final agreement with the Coyotes.

Catching up on other news…

July 2nd, 2009, 10:21 am by Le Templar
U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano (far left) was part of a White House meeting in February with President Barack Obama in this photo posted at whitehouse.gov by the Obama administration.

U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano (far left) was part of a White House meeting in February with President Barack Obama in this photo posted at whitehouse.gov by the Obama administration.

With the state budget crisis on hold until Monday, I can take a moment to mention other tidbits that have happened in the past week or so. Here’s a few items that caught my eye:

  • Janet Napolitano, one-time governor and now U.S. Homeland Security secretary, was named by President Barack Obama to be his lead negotiator with Congress on immigration reform policies. Obama revealed this after a high-level June 25 meeting at the White House intended to jump-start an effort to finally resolve the nation’s broken immigration system. Napolitano received a huge amount of media attention when the swine flu pandemic was first identified. She seemed to be on my television news every day for weeks. Now, she it’s likely she’ll be back in the spotlight this fall on an issue that, until the economy collapsed, had been one of hottest domestic topics especially among talk radio and television and certainly here in Arizona.
  • Have you taken the Tribune’s Fourth of July quiz yet? And you passed, right? Of course you did, that’s why you read this blog! But if you are, say, under 30, you are likely to be in a shrinking minority who actually understand basic American civics. Tribune writer Mandy Zajac used questions from the official test given to all immigrants seeking to become U.S. citizens. The Goldwater Institute used the same test when it recently surveyed 1,350 Arizona public high school students and found nearly 97 percent couldn’t pass the exam! The institute’s Matthew Ladner suggests high schools should require the citizenship test for graduation, or colleges should require it for admission. I’ve got to say, if we expect foreigners in this country to have this knowledge, how we can fail to demand it from everyone else?
  • The Associated Press reported on a Republican candidate for Maine’s governor who appears to have “borrowed” the Obama campaign logo from last year. I’m detecting a pattern here, as we noticed a similar concern in April with John Paul Mitchell, a Republican candidate for Arizona governor.

State budget countdown: Anti-tax groups lobby against budget plan

June 26th, 2009, 2:25 pm by Le Templar

Anti-tax groups are trying to rally their members and supporters to slam state lawmakers with phone calls and emails that object to a “handshake deal” on the state budget between Gov. Jan Brewer and legislative leaders. Apparently, a possible flat rate on personal income taxes isn’t enough to outweigh their fears of a 1-cent sales tax increase.

The Arizona chapter of Americans for Prosperity is sending out email alerts and the Goldwater Institute has thrown together a pretty funny opposition video that has the feel of a campaign TV ad. Take a look at it below.

YouTube Preview Image

If they can take away your tattoos…

March 24th, 2009, 3:39 pm by Le Templar


THE MESA CITY COUNCIL HAS DECIDED RYAN COLEMAN WON’T BE ALLOWED TO OPEN A TATTOO PARLOR AT DOBSON AND BASELINE ROADS (Tribune file photo).

I don’t have any tattoos, never wanted any. But several members of my family do. None of them are gang members or are living a life of crime. And all of them would fit comfortably into the lifestyle of west Mesa’s Dobson Ranch subdivision.

So I am thinking of my own family when I say I’m shocked that only Mesa Mayor Scott Smith seems to understand the troubling discrimination behind the CIty Council’s rejection of a new tattoo shop at Dobson and Baseline roads. Tattoo artist Ryan Coleman met all of Mesa’s zoning requirements and he seems quite sensitive to the seedy reputation of his industry, as he pledged to not ink gang or racist tattoos on anyone.

But the Dobson Ranch Homeowners Association is adamant that allowing one more tattoo shop next to a massage parlor, a hair salon and a manicurist would drive their community into a tailspin. Councilman Dennis Kavanaugh focused on the “nearby” locations of two other tattoo shops, ignoring the fact that Mesa has a 1,200-foot buffer zone in part to avoid an undue concentration. Should tattoo parlors be kept a mile apart instead, or maybe five miles apart? Maybe Mesa finally would be “safe” if we allowed only one shop in the entire city.

The Angel Tattoo case seems ripe for a winnable lawsuit, given that the City Council approved another tattoo shop in 2006 that was within 1,200 feet of a school, of all places. The Goldwater Institute already is going after Tempe for adopting a similar “just say no” attitude.

A Tribune editorial on the subject points out that tattoos are a popular cultural phenomenon, not a perverted habit better kept to the shadows. If government can get away with refusing to allow this legitimate business to operate because of public pressure, I just hope that your neighbors don’t come to hate what you do for a living or your business could be next the target.

The libertarian way to run a city

March 12th, 2009, 5:12 pm by Le Templar

Ever wonder what your city might look like if it was governed solely by the fundamental principles of this country’s founders? The Goldwater Institute has just published a road map to such a vision with its “10 Rights to Restrain Government and Protect Freedom.” While couched in language that invokes the original Bill of Rights, the document outlines a entire new constitution for local governments that would significantly limit their powers to interfere with our lives and protect the right to use our property as we see fit.

Author Nick Dranias paints a picture of how the American view of government — with a separation of powers and hefty barriers to imposing new regulations — simply does not apply to local governments in Arizona. Most power flows downward from a single governing board that frequently usurps authority to dictate the actions of specific individuals.  As a result, Dranias argues, local governments have enjoyed explosive growth in the past two decades that can’t be sustained because they are so expensive to operate.

So Dranias offers a set of sweeping reforms in a Local Liberty Charter that  would radically change the organization and practical impact of counties, cities and other local governments. Some of the provisions include:

  • A codified presumption of liberty, that everyone “is free to
    act peaceably and honestly,” and government should interfere with that freedom only when there’s an clear, immediate threat to public safety or health.
  • Require the automatic repeal of all regulations unless the government can prove a specific regulation meets a limited number of transparent standards.
  • Eliminate all zoning laws and rely instead on private covenants and property-owner associations, similar to how land-use management works now how in Houston.
  • Clearly separate legislative, executive and judicial functions at the local level.
  • Force police departments to reduce crime by meeting certain benchmarks, or contract with another jurisdiction to do the job instead.
  • Limit spending growth to the rate of population growth plus inflation. And,
  • Reject all federal funds that come with any mandates or strings attached, which is just about every dime that Congress doles out.

As is common in think-tank reports, Goldwater focuses on principles and good theories while ignoring the political realities. For example, libertarian purists always point to Houston as their ideal but no other American city has ever dropped its zoning laws to try that model. And for a few years in the 1980s, the Prescott City Council rejected federal funds that are sought routinely sought by other municipalities. That policy lasted until Prescott found itself at risk of running out of water supplies to support development. (Federal grants are available for water treatment and accessing new water sources).

Still, the Goldwater report provides a new prism to use as the public examines what local government is doing, and what might be a better approach to promote liberty and a free people.

Appeals court rejects massive Phoenix subsidy for shopping mall

December 23rd, 2008, 3:00 pm by Le Templar

The Arizona Court of Appeals today rejected most of the $97.4 million subsidy that Phoenix offered to land the CityNorth shopping development near Scottsdale Road and Loop 101. The court agreed with the Goldwater Institute that the subsidy generally violates the Arizona Constitution’s “gift clause.” Phoenix tried to claim the subsidy was justified because it paid for a 3,100-vehicle parking garage with guaranteed free parking for the public. Instead, the court said the city could only legally pay for 200 spaces reserved for commuters who park and ride on public transit. The rest of the subsidy is an unconstitutional benefit to private interests, the opinion says.

The appellate decision overrules a lower court that found what Phoenix did was just fine. So it’s easy to predict that Phoenix and CityNorth will further appeal to the Arizona Supreme Court. But this ruling gives new credence to the move of the Goldwater Institute to challenge the subsidy and inject new life into the “gift clause.”

Goldwater outlines realistic plan for balancing state budget

December 22nd, 2008, 5:21 pm by Le Templar


I haven’t found a lot of time (or material) to blog about lately. But I haven’t seen any coverage of a new policy report from the Goldwater Institute on resolving the state’s predicted $1.2 billion budget deficit from a libertarian perspective. That means no tax or government fee increases and no additional debt; just whacking away at state government funding, which has grown by an estimated 67 percent since 2004.

Goldwater takes a “no sacred cows” approach, relying heavily on various budget reduction proposals in the past six years offered by legislative budget staff but never approved by the full Legislature. The report also takes into account that the state’s fiscal year is about six months over, so nearly half of the $10 billion General Fund budget already has been spent. Some highlights include:

  • $210 million, or a 15 percent cut, for the Arizona Health Cost Containment System (the state Medicaid insurance program). Goldwater suggests that lawmakers let the agency figure out where to find the savings, but does offer some ideas including raising insurance premiums, double-checking the eligibility of applicants and shrinking overhead. Goldwater also urges elimination of any benefit not required for federal matching funds, which could save more money.
  • $100 million by eliminating full-day kindergarten and going back to state-funded half-day kindergarten. This would become a yearly savings of $200 million.
  • $100 million, or a 10 percent cut, to the state’s three public universities.
  • $95 million, or a 10 percent cut, to the state prison system. Goldwater wants lawmakers to make addition nonviolent offenders eligible for early parole and home monitoring. Maricopa County Andrew Thomas might have a particular objection to this, as he has argued the state should be sending more criminals to prison, not less.
  • Another $69.5 million in state aid to school districts and other K-12 education programs.
  • $61 million, or a 10 percent cut, to the Department of Health Services. Goldwater acknowledges this would force the state to reduce vaccinations and immunization information, disease surveillance and research, and poison control assistance.
  • Save about $36 million by eliminating the arts commission, the Department of Commerce and the state tourism office. Goldwater has previously urged the Legislature to abolish these agencies and transfer any critically needed programs elsewhere.

In its conclusion, the Goldwater Institute admits its comprehensive list still would leave a $140 million deficit this year. It also doesn’t address what happens with the next budget that starts July 1. Across-the-board cuts of 10 percent are practically inevitable, and I think full-day kindergarten seriously faces elimination with the make-up of the next Legislature and Janet Napolitano no longer in the governor’s office. But the real value of Goldwater’s report is to illustrate the true depth of the fiscal crisis and how difficult it will be for the Legislature to fix.

You can read the full report if you click on the picture of the front page at the top of this post.

ADVERTISEMENT