
Archive for the 'Harry Mitchell' Tag
November 16th, 2009, 10:26 am by Le Templar
 Reps. Gabrielle Giffords and Harry Mitchell
Vice President Joe Biden is in Arizona this morning, trying to build support for the White House economic stimulus efforts and attending a fundraiser for some Democrats in the state’s delegation to the U.S. House of Representatives. Biden’s visit coincides with a growing national consensus that Reps. Harry Mitchell and Gabrielle Giffords could be especially at risk to a national shift in voter sentiment back to the Republican Party.
Independent observers are doing some detailed analyses that point to Mitchell and Giffords as among the incumbent Democrats most vulnerable in the 2010 election. For example, the political web site fivethirtyeight.com lists Mitchell among the top nine House Democrats to be in danger. Giffords lands in the next lower tier but still is among the top 20. (Hat tip to Phxated.com for writing about this first.)
What do these vulnerable Democrats have in common? They come from districts where Republicans have the edge in voter registration and the Democrats didn’t have overwhelming victories in 2008. These Democrats have voted for the health care reform legislation or cap-and-trade carbon emissions (Giffords voted for both). And they have a relatively weak advantage in fundraising over potential challengers.
However, I suspect this view of Mitchell and Giffords has been generated in part by wishful thinking by Republicans who can’t understand why these two keep getting elected. For Mitchell, Congressional District 5 has thousands of Republicans and independent voters who don’t cast ballots based on his party or his congressional record. They are voting for a beloved former teacher who introduced them to politics through their high school civics class. Mitchell is something of a surrogate grandfather whose views don’t always match the voters, but he hasn’t done anything too crazy. A contested Republican primary next year will help Mitchell because some opponent fundraising will be spent in the primary instead of all of it being directed at him.
For Giffords in Congressional District 8, she always has understood exactly her challenges as a Democrat since she first ran in 2006. Emphasizing her native roots and love for Tucson, Giffords connects very well with people one-on-one. She also is relentless about fundraising, and the fivethirtyeight.com analysis shows she has the biggest lead in cash among all of the identified vulnerable Democrats.
Personally, I’ve been impressed with that district’s upstart campaign of Republican Jesse Kelly. He’s positioned himself well on the issues to take advantage of the anti-incumbent, anti-Democrat mood that appears to be bubbling up. His biggest problem has been convincing the Republican Party that he can overcome a lack of name identification to seriously threaten Giffords. He’s made some in-roads, but there are many Republicans still looking for a candidate better known to voters. State Sen. Jonathan Paton, R-Tucson, is frequently mentioned as a dream challenger.
The vice president is raising money today for one incumbent not included on that most-vulnerable list: Ann Kirkpatrick. The Congressional District 1 race is flying under the radar because Democrats have more registered voters and Kirkpatrick’s potential challengers haven’t raised much money, yet. But the district is quite conservative and Kirkpatrick won her first term in the fallout from former Rep. Rick Renzi’s criminal indictment for political corruption. There’s also this video where Kirkpatrick literally walked out of a meeting with her constituents. Expect that video to get a lot of air time and blogger references in the coming year.
My guess is Kirkpatrick will be at least as vulnerable as Mitchell and Giffords next year.
Posted in: Congress • Election issues • Ann Kirkpatrick • fivethirtyeight.com • Gabrielle Giffords • Harry Mitchell • Joe Biden • Rick Renzi | 11 Comments »
November 4th, 2009, 1:40 pm by Le Templar
 Rep. Gabrielle Giffords sent this photo by Twitter Wednesday morning to show she's reading the latest health care reform bill.
One of the most stinging comments about Congress this summer during the health care town halls and TEA parties was Democrats were pushing major bills so fast that lawmakers couldn’t possibly read and understand what was in them before voting. One group even launched a campaign to get written pledges from individual lawmakers that they would read any health care reform legislation before voting “yes” or “no.” In turn, enough pledges would force the Senate and House to prepare written versions of such bills a few days before any votes so the public could digest them as well.
But exactly how do members of Congress “prove” they have read a bill? Issuing news releases would be a written form of saying, “I did my homework,” and wouldn’t convince the skeptical.
So some members of Arizona’s congressional delegation have turned to social media such as Twitter to show what they are learning in real time. Republican Rep. John Shadegg started the trend on Oct. 29 when he sent out the following tweet at 2:51 p.m.:
“Pg. 140 of the #healthbill extends immunity to ERISA insurers when they wrongfully deny coverage http://tinyurl.com/yzaqnac”
Several others joined in Tuesday. GOP Rep. Jeff Flake shared his first thoughts at 1:30 p.m.:
“Sitting around a table with my Republican colleagues, reading the massive Pelosi healthcare bill. Haven’t found anything good in it yet.”
Rep. Trent Franks piled on about 2.5 hours later:
“H.R. 3962 essentially does away with private insurance http://amplify.com/u/sqv via @RepTrentFranks #tcot #handsoff #hcr #gop”
A couple of Democrats have spoken up as well. Rep. Harry Mitchell pointed to a couple of highlights at 4:30 p.m. Tuesday:
“Reading HC Bill – Some items of note: Sen McCain idea - high risk pool pg 16; Insurance can’t drop people w preexisting conditions pg 95″
Then today, Mitchell sent back-to-back tweets at 9:30 a.m.:
“More notes from reading the bill Section 309 PG 202 - Insurance Across State Lines”
“Other sections to look at carefully Public Option Negotiated Rates: Sec 323 PG 216 & Small Business Exemption up to $500,000: Sec 413 PG 276″
Rep. Gabrielle Giffords decided to go the route of “a picture is worth a thousand words,” with the above photo of her with bill in hand. Not to be outdone, Republican Rep. Trent Franks went with this tweet:
“@RepShimkus RT Side by side, the Pelosi Health Care Bill and the GOP Alternative: http://twitpic.com/o8zuh More freedom or more government?”
Here’s the photo that the tweet points to:

So, are you convinced these people will know what they are voting on?
Posted in: Congress • Gabrielle Giffords • H.R. 3962 • Harry Mitchell • health care reform • Jeff Flake • John Shadegg • Trent Franks | Post a Comment »
September 16th, 2009, 3:58 pm by Le Templar
 Jim Ward
Some Republicans from Rep. Harry Mitchell’s home district have complained because the Democratic congressman didn’t host any town halls on health care reform or any other topic during the August recess. Mitchell did hold a couple of telephone conference calls with the public that his staff says reached more than 18,000 people. But some people in Congressional District 5 felt cheated because they didn’t get an opportunity to discuss the issue in person with their representative. The people I heard from didn’t want a shouting match. They just wanted to have an honest discussion about what Democrats in Congress have proposed and to hear what Mitchell thinks about it.
Well, Republicans are getting at least part of that wish, as venture capitalist and 2010 congressional candidate Jim Ward is hosting a health care reform forum tonight (Wednesday) at 7 p.m. at the Mustang Library in Scottsdale.
Ward will have on hand a couple of experts: Clint Bolick from the Goldwater Institute and Dr. Eric Novack from Arizonans for Health Care Freedom. Clearly, the panel will be biased against what President Barack Obama has proposed, but the discussion still could get lively.
Posted in: Election issues • 2010 elections • Congressional District 5 • Harry Mitchell • Jim Ward • President Barack Obama • Sonoran Alliance | 1 Comment »
November 18th, 2008, 3:11 pm by Le Templar

REP. HARRY MITCHELL
Rep. Gabrielle Giffords, D-Ariz., has announced that her colleague, Rep. Harry Mitchell, D-Tempe, was one of six House members added today to the Blue Dog Coalition. This issue-oriented congressional caucus (or voting bloc) is centered around Democrats who want their party to shed the image of “tax-and-spend,” and adopt conservative fiscal policies that includes lowering key taxes and balancing the budget as soon as possible. The coalition also serves as a sanctuary for Democrats who are pro-life or strong gun rights advocates, in conflict with the official party platform.
Membership in the coalition is restricted and considered desireable because Republicans have a hard time labeling such Democrats as “liberal.” Washington political observers were surprised when Giffords was added to the coalition after the 2004 election but Mitchell wasn’t.
Apparently, with a larger Democratic majority next year, the coalition decided to grow as well and Mitchell made the cut this time.
Posted in: Congress • Blue Dog Democrats • Gabrielle Giffords • Harry Mitchell | Post a Comment »
October 25th, 2008, 10:29 am by Le Templar
Now I know why Arizona Democrats are so enthusiastic about the Nov. 4 election. The Republican Party’s edge in registered voters has slipped to less than 100,000 people, or 37 percent of the total number of registered voters compared to the Democrats’ 34 percent. As reported today by Paul Davenport with The Associated Press, Democrats have moved above 1 million registered voters for the first time ever. Just four years ago, Republicans held a 40 percent to 35 percent advantage.
The biggest swings include the 3rd Congressional District (home of Rep. John Shadegg, R-Ariz.) where Republicans actually have lost about 500 registered voters since 2004, while Democrats have added about 5,000; and in the 5th Congressional District (home of Rep. Harry Mitchell, D-Ariz.) where Republicans have lost a whopping 10,000 registered voters while Democrats have picked up about 9,000. (The GOP still has the largest number of voters in both districts).
Of course, both major parties have lost a huge number of voters to minor parties and unaffiliated independent registrations. The portion of voters registered in the “other” category (which excludes Republicans, Democrats, Libertarians and now the Green Party), has surged from 17 percent in 2000 to almost 28 percent now.
But independents tended to vote for Democrats in 2006, which is why that party unexpectedly picked up additional seats in the Arizona Legislature and Mitchell defeated former Rep. J.D. Hayworth. All signs point to independents doing the same this year. This reinforces my expectation that Arizona will send more Democrats than Republicans to the U.S. House for the first time since 1966. But I still believe there aren’t enough viable Democrat candidates for that party to take control of either chamber in the Legislature.
Posted in: Arizona Legislature • Congress • Election issues • Arizona voter registration • Harry Mitchell • J.D. Hayworth • John Shadegg | 3 Comments »
October 2nd, 2008, 3:15 pm by Le Templar

JOHN SHADEGG BOB LORD
The candidates for the 3rd Congressional District have been firing back and forth this week over the $700 billion bailout package, in part because of this blog.
The campaign of Republican incumbent John Shadegg began the tussle with a news release Wednesday referring to my post Monday about Lord, the Democratic challenger, sending out a strong statement opposing the bailout package as the House vote already was going against it. Shadegg’s campaign picked up on the fact that Lord spoke out only after the bill already was doomed.
“What courage it must have taken for Bob Lord to decide he was against the bailout bill after the vote was taken,” Shadegg campaign manager Sean Noble said. ”I can see him now: With C-SPAN on the TV, a press release supporting the bill in one hand, another press release opposing the bill in the other, Bob courageously decided to issue the release opposing the bill after the vote. I can’t imagine the pressure he was feeling.”
Noble’s quote is a somewhat subtle reference to this story from the Associated Press on Monday, which implied Arizona Democrats Harry Mitchell and Gabrielle Giffords were prepared to vote either way, depending on whether their votes would help House leaders push the measure to passage (In the end, they both voted no).
Lord shot back today with a news release referring to a comment by him published Sept. 23 in the Phoenix Business Journal raising questions about a lack of oversight in the Bush administration’s original proposal.
“When you vote with President Bush’s House leadership 98 percent of the time, maybe you even pick up Bush’s bad habits, like not reading the newspaper,” said Andrew Eldredge-Martin, Lord’s campaign manager. “The American economy cannot afford more of the same failed Bush economic policies that got us into this financial crisis, and Arizona cannot afford John Shadegg’s blind support of Bush’s economic agenda. Arizona deserves better.”
I hadn’t seen Lord’s original quote, but he didn’t appear to be opposing the $700 billion bailout as a concept. His comment at the time focuses solely on who would be watching how the Treasury secretary uses the money. That’s reinforced by Lord’s new willingness to support the bailout in the latest version approved by the Senate Wednesday night.
“It’s clear we need to take action, I think the plan now before the House has improved and will provide needed economic stimulus,” Lord said in a second news release today. “However, our job is not done yet. We have to be vigilant with oversight of the Treasury and serious about accountability on Wall Street. We have to keep people in their homes. Most of all we need to end the disastrous Bush economic policies that got us here in the first place.”
Of course, Shadegg could wind up supporting the package as well, considering how far the stock market droppped Monday when the House rejected the earlier version. Principled public opposition appears to be eroding as people realize what happens on Wall Street affects the pension funds and retirement plans for millions of Americans.
Posted in: Congress • Election issues • Uncategorized • $700 billion bailout • Bob Lord • Gabrielle Giffords • Harry Mitchell • John Shadegg | 4 Comments »
September 29th, 2008, 2:09 pm by Le Templar

BOB LORD
Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio, sounded pathetic today when he blamed the defeat of President Bush’s $700 billion bailout for Wall Street on a floor speech from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. But Democrats like Bob Lord aren’t looking much better when they test where the winds are blowing and then pretend they are taking a strong stand on the hottest issue of the moment.
Lord, the challenger in the Fifth Congressional District, sent out a last-minute news release claiming the bailout has been wrong since it was first proposed a week ago. But Lord’s news release was delivered, at least to my e-mail box, at 10:53 a.m. Monday as the bailout package already was going down to defeat and the stock market plunging in response.
By contrast, Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., has been objecting for days to the Bush administration proposal and issued his own news release rejecting the new compromise version on Sunday afternoon, more than 12 hours before the vote took place.
Lord isn’t the only Democrat in making a political calculation about whether to support a plan that Wall Street desperately wants but has the public hopping mad. Every single House member from Arizona cast their final vote against the measure today. I can see Reps. Harry Mitchell and Gabrielle Giffords making a safe play, as they have serious Republican challengers this year. But I wonder how Reps. Ed Pastor and Raul Grijalva will justify voting against their own party’s leaders and with Reps. John Shadegg and Trent Franks?
Posted in: Congress • Election issues • $700 billion bailout • Bob Lord • Ed Pastor • Gabrielle Giffords • Harry Mitchell • Jeff Flake • John Boehner • John Shadegg • Nancy Pelosi • Raul Grijalva • Trent Franks | Post a Comment »
|
|