Search: Web        
powered by
Le Templar: What I Know ~

Archive for the 'Joe Arpaio' Tag

Stapley arrest suggests Arpaio losing savvy

September 21st, 2009, 4:13 pm by Le Templar

Is there anyone who takes at face value a claim from Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio that his office’s arrest of county Supervisor Don Stapley this morning has absolutely no connection to Friday’s dismissal of the remaining criminal counts against Stapley from a previous case? Of course, some people believe the original investigation and arrest of Stapley was spurred after Stapley publicly questioned Arpaio’s management of the sheriff’s office in the wake of the Tribune’s Pulitzer Prize-winning series, “Reasonable Doubt.” It’s part of the reason that Maricopa County government has become a feuding snake pit, with Stapley’s colleagues essentially siding with him and against Arpaio in various power struggles and lawsuits.

But a lot of people outside of county government were willing to give Arpaio a lot of leeway politically. Stapley has been a county supervisor for a long time, but he’s also a real estate developer who has close ties to a convicted felon. Perhaps the sheriff’s investigators really had found some wrongdoing on Stapley’s part, many people reasoned.

But to claim today’s arrest was a complete coincidence? I don’t think hardly anyone is going to believe Arpaio this time. This investigation has been underway since January, and supposedly was finished 12 days ago. But Arpaio’s office didn’t refer the case to County Attorney Andrew Thomas or another prosecutor to seek an indictment, which is the typical step for a complex and lengthy investigation targeting an elected official. No, Arpaio or one of his supervisors just randomly decided today was the day to rush out and arrest Stapley. Oh, sure.

The bad timing can only damage the state’s efforts to actually convict Stapley if the sheriff does have credible evidence of felony crimes. Certainly, any judge or jury is going at least wonder if the filing of another 100 criminal charges at this point is politically motivated.

Today’s arrest was the wrong legal move and it didn’t help Arpaio’s public image either. That seems rather odd for a sheriff who usually finesses the latter so well.

RELATED:

Sheriff’s Office: Stapley arrested in tax, campaign, business fraud

Romney to ‘chase’ PAC funds in Valley

September 15th, 2009, 2:04 pm by Le Templar
Mitt Romney/Associate Press photo

Mitt Romney/Associate Press photo

If you believe you should be president, typically you are extremely self-confident and able to dream big. Well, Republican Mitt Romney must have both qualities in spades. Invitations went out to today for a Sept. 30 appearance by Romney here in the Valley to raise money for his Free and Strong America PAC. Romney is offering tickets from $300 to $3,000 for a noon luncheon at Chase Field, home of the Arizona Diamondbacks. Romney is not trying to fill a meeting room or a luxury box, but the entire baseball stadium! Blogger Bill Wyman noted that a sell-out (at $3,000 for each seat) would raise $15 million.

Renting out Chase Field for a political fundraiser might be overly optimistic. Romney has strong political support in Arizona, including Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, state Senate Majority Leader Chuck Gray, R-Mesa, and Mesa real estate developer Wilford Cardon. But this state didn’t figure that prominently in Romney fundraising during the 2008 campaign.

However, Romney hopes to capitalize on his strong, second place finish in the 2008 Arizona presidential primary to home state hero John McCain. Arizona’s senior senator won’t be a factor in 2012, while Romney has been preparing for that race from the day that Barack Obama was declared last year’s winner.

Thomas doesn’t need to do anything about sheriff’s captain

September 2nd, 2009, 3:26 pm by Le Templar
Andrew Thomas (Associated Press Photo)

Andrew Thomas (Associated Press Photo)

Some Valley media types and critics of Maricopa County Attorney Andrew Thomas keep asking what he’s going to do with a investigative referral today from county Elections Director Karen Osborne, who said in writing there’s probable cause that a ranking member of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office has violated state campaign finance laws.

But those critics are being silly. Thomas doesn’t have to do a thing, because state Attorney General Terry Goddard already is on the case.

There’s long, torturous story behind Capt. Joel Fox and the SCA, a previously anonymous collection of donors that have become connected to Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s re-election campaign in 2008. The Tribune covered some of the facts behind the case earlier this year, but the Phoenix New Times has provided the most thorough coverage, if somewhat slanted against Fox and the sheriff’s office. The case boils down to this:

In 2006, Fox set up a private, unregistered group to gather funds for some type of publicity to defend the sheriff’s office from what Fox calls unfair criticism. But Fox never actually spent those funds. Then in 2008, Fox gave $105,000 to the state Republican Party, which Fox said was because the donors wanted the money put to some purpose and he didn’t know what else to do with it. Fox says he never told the Republican Party how to use the cash.

But the state Democratic Party claimed the SCA donation was used to fund a pair of campaign ads against Thomas and Apraio that were sponsored by a GOP-created political action committee. The Republican Party also denied any connection, but returned the $105,000 to SCA after Fox refused to disclose who donated to his group.

Both state and the county election officials determined that whatever Fox’s original intent, his group became a political action committee when it made a political contribution. Fox fought the county for months, but finally turned over SCA records to avoid a $315,000 fine. Meanwhile, Goddard’s office quietly served a search warrant in March also looking for SCA records. That search warrant was only recently revealed and was unsealed Monday.

Osborne said today that the records and donor checks point to specific violations of state law, such as donations offered to a political party that are “earmarked” to help a specific candidate.

Once an election official determines there’s probable cause a campaign violation exists, the case is turned over to the relevant state or county prosecutor, who then decides whether to actually impose a fine or to seek criminal sanctions. Osborne has turned the Fox case over to Thomas’ office.

But Thomas doesn’t have to do anything. If he’s smart, Thomas will sit on the case and await the outcome of the separate Goddard investigation. When questioned about it, Thomas might even argue that’s a good use of taxpayer resources. Why should two levels of government be investigating the same person for possible violations of the same set of statutes?

Any political fallout would land on Goddard’s shoulders, and Thomas doesn’t have to risk angering Arpaio or his top lieutenants as Thomas considers running for attorney general next year.

Apraio looks to spoil Gascon’s final hurrah

July 23rd, 2009, 11:27 am by Le Templar
Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio

Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s deputies (and along with Pinal County deputies) have started another “crime suppression sweep” across a wide swath of the East Valley. Today just happens to be Mesa’s formal goodbye party for the city’s police chief, George Gascon, who is leaving for San Francisco.

Given the story about Gascon that the Tribune printed online Tuesday night, I have no idea how Arpaio says the following this morning and expects anyone with a modicum of intelligence to believe him:

“I don’t care about this guy,” Arpaio told Tribune writer Gary Grado. “I don’t know his birthday, I don’t know his last day.”

This contrasts with what was sent on Twitter Wednesday to followers of @RealSheriffJoe:

I wish the Mesa police Chief a safe move to San Fran,and if I’m ever in san Fran? maybe he’ll invite me to an italian dinner.”

Arpaio has gone out of his way to tell people that this is his real Twitter account. So he can’t pretend now that he didn’t say it. Whether or not Arpaio was being sincere on Twitter, clearly he cares about Gascon’s departure.

And today’s crime suppression sweep is no coincidence.


Texas town highlights why we can’t ignore abuse of police power

March 17th, 2009, 12:23 pm by Le Templar

It’s hard for a lot of people in Maricopa County to understand why there’s so much national consternation about Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his tactics for arresting illegal immigrants. I suspect one reason behind the gap between local and national views is because we are simply so close to the issue. “Illegal immigration is a huge problem here. Sheriff Arpaio is trying to do something about it. What more do we need to know?”

Well, I came across a story over the weekend that provides an analogy for why it’s important to not simply take Arpaio at his word and to independently determine if the rights of American citizens and foreigners are being trampled under the guise of cracking down on illegal activity.

Tenaha is a tiny town of 1,046 on the Texas-Louisana border that appears to have an official policy of forcing black travelers to turn over their money and their vehicles to the police to avoid facing drug charges. The Chicago Tribune reported on a federal class-action lawsuit filed against the town. The leading lawyer says only about one in four cases did Tenaha actually charge someone with drug possession from 2006 to 2008. Nearly three-quarters of the time, the police seized anything they could put their hands on without finding any drugs, or at least without charging the “suspects” with a crime.

The police tactic described is particularly chilling. Imagine traveling by motor vehicle to a distant part of the country. You are carrying extra cash, maybe because you are going to gamble at a casino, or maybe you just don’t trust credit cards. You are pulled over in a small town by the local police and they come up with a reason to search your car. Then, you are shocked when told they found some drugs hidden under the seat or in the trunk. You are facing felony charges and potentially serious jail time.

The police say if you will “voluntarily” turn over your money and some other possessions, they will let you go and the justice system will look more favorably on you if this eventually goes to court.

You know the police are lying about finding any drugs. But if you say “no,” you have to come up with bail money and you will be fighting this dark cloud far from home for months. Say “yes” and you lose your belongings, but at least you can walk away.

Officials in Tenaha say they are using state drug forfeiture laws as a tool to challenge a large amount of drug trafficking that passes through their community.

“We try to enforce the law,” Mayor George Bowers told the Chicago Tribune. “We’re not doing this to raise money.”

So, do you buy the mayor’s explanation? I sure don’t.

Add in the fact that police have pre-printed forms because they handle this type of “transaction” so often, and the evidence that blacks seem to be targeted beyond all rational proportions, and it seems like something sinister is going on.

The Tenaha mayor’s explanation has some eerie similarities to what the sheriff’s office said when it tried to convince Tribune reporters last year that deputies weren’t violating anyone’s civil rights while making illegal immigration stops, despite what those reporters saw with their own eyes.

It’s good that the federal government is taking a close look at what Arpaio is doing. What kind of long-term success can we hope to achieve against the dangers of illegal immigration if we have to sacrifice liberty and freedom from police abuse in the process?

ADVERTISEMENT