Search: Web        
powered by
Le Templar: What I Know ~

Archive for the 'State budget countdown' Tag

Senators want to see the budget

June 30th, 2009, 2:28 pm by Le Templar
Sen. Jay Tibshraeny, R-Chandler, waits to make a point Tuesday as legislators discuss elements of the budget proposal (Capitol Media Services photo by Howard Fischer).

Sen. Jay Tibshraeny, R-Chandler, waits to make a point Tuesday as legislators discuss elements of the budget proposal (Capitol Media Services photo by Howard Fischer).

Frantic budget negotiations continue behind closed doors at the state Capitol at this hour. Rep. David Lujan, D-Phoenix, has sent out word by Twitter that Gov. Jan Brewer is directly involved in trying to convince individual Democrats to vote for at least the proposed sales tax election that could minimize the more than $600 billion in budget cuts.

Meanwhile, the Senate took some votes on unrelated bills and, according to the live Web broadcast, several senators used their speaking time to talk more about the budget. Several Democrats decried the funding reductions and policy changes for school districts, with Sen. Paula Aboud, D-Tucson, describing the proposed budget as “an insult to teachers and to all of the work you do.”

Sen. John Huppenthal, R-Chandler and a likely candidate for schools superintendent next year, defended the Republican approach.
“Those comments are partisan and incorrectly describe what has been done as we have wrapped ourselves around the axle trying to limit cuts to education.,” he said.

Sen. Jay Tibshraeny, R-Chandler, wanted to know why they were taking any votes on unrelated bills. After all, there’s only 9.5 hours until the current fiscal year ends. “Let’s get on with the budget,” Tibshraeny said.

State budget countdown update

June 30th, 2009, 1:15 pm by Le Templar

The Senate Rules Committee this morning punched a huge hole in the proposed budget deal — by rejecting the bill that would create a temporary increase in the state sales tax and spells out how the money would be spent. Oddly, enough the Legislature’s Web site shows the same committee signed off on a separate bill that would authorize a special statewide election in November to approve that sales tax increase.

Meanwhile, the House of Representatives appears to be heading toward action on the budget deal, but without either the sales tax election or the proposed switch in 2012 from graduated income tax system to a flat rate, which was supposed to be the inducement for fiscal conservatives to support the temporary sales tax. That would imply legislative Republicans are ready to send Gov. Jan Brewer a budget with a lot of the changes she wanted, but without any hope of mitigating the education and health care funding cuts that she opposes.

Brewer has been threatening for weeks to veto the entire budget if it doesn’t include a sales tax election or similar alternative. But does she have the backbone to veto a budget on the final day of the fiscal year and start shutting down portions of state government that aren’t protected by the state constitution?

State budget countdown: Time’s up!

June 30th, 2009, 7:20 am by Le Templar

This is it; the last day of fiscal year 2008-2009 for Arizona state government. State lawmakers now have until midnight, or about 17 hours from now as I write, to adopt some kind of budget plan that Gov. Jan Brewer will sign — or risk a government shutdown once Brewer’s administration and independent state agencies lose their spending authority. A shutdown would affect everything from the Department of Public Safety to the prison system to the state’s three public universities to local school districts that depend on state funds to pay their bills. Health care for the poor and disabled, child abuse investigations, state parks and services for veterans all could be stopped immediately.

The budget deal reached last week between Brewer and the top two legislative leaders finally passed one test late Monday night, when it was narrowly approved by the Senate Committee on Education Accountability and Reform. The full Senate is scheduled to start debating the proposal shortly after 9:30 a.m. this morning. So far, Senate President Bob Burns doesn’t appear to have enough Republican votes for a statewide sales tax election, which Brewer says must be part of the package. And Democrats insist they are rejecting the entire plan. If the Senate somehow does approve, we don’t know what will happen in the House of Representatives.

Today we find out if the Arizona Legislature and governor are at least as competent as California and the federal government.  Those two entities manage to adopt some kind of spending plan to keep government operating even when they can’t manage to agree on a formal budget, most of the time anyway.

Still hope for a state budget?

June 29th, 2009, 6:11 pm by Le Templar

As I suggested in my last post, Democratic state lawmakers are trying to position the debate about the state budget as “it’s all the Republicans fault” while senators from both sides are now publicly grousing about the lack of progress.
Sen. Rebecca Rios, D-Apache Junction, said her party has been offering for months to help.
“Despite our repeated efforts and literally begging, we have not been included in the budget process,” Rios said.
Sen. Ron Gould, R-Lake Havasu City (who opposed the Brewer-Burns-Adams budget deal) responded that Democratic alternatives fail to acknowledge that state revenues are down 40 percent from last year.
“We need to right-size Arizona’s government,” Gould said. “We need to get spending under control and we need to do it quickly. If we need to shut down state government to do it, so be it.”
Sen. Jim Waring, R-Phoenix, showed frustration with his colleagues from both parties.
“One thing that isn’t going to get the budget done is if we keep talking here (on the Senate floor),” Waring said. “Shhh. Stop talking. Let’s back to committee and let’s get the work done.”
Meanwhile, Senate President Bob Burns just removed all of the budget trailer bills from the Senate Appropriations Committee (which blocked the main bill this morning) and assigned them to the “more friendly” Committee on Education Accountability and Reform. The committee is expected to meet shortly. This means the budget deal is still kicking, even if it’s on life support.

Budget clock clicks away

June 29th, 2009, 4:53 pm by Le Templar

As I write this, it’s 4:50 p.m. Monday. The Senate Appropriations Committee still hasn’t returned to try to take up the budget deal struck late last week between Gov. Jan Brewer, Senate President Bob Burns and House Speaker Kirk Adams. The House Appropriations Committee was scheduled to meet at 11 a.m. to take up the proposed sales tax election and flat rate for income taxes, but hasn’t. Both the full Senate and the House have taken up other matters this afternoon, and there’s no public sign of any movement on the budget at all. It seems likely legislative leaders will have to give up on the deal for now and seek to quickly pass a temporary spending plan to avoid a government shutdown when the fiscal year ends at midnight Tuesday.

Interestingly, Democrats appear to be leaning toward opposing any such move, under the assumption that Brewer and Republicans would receive most of the blame for a government shutdown. But that’s a dangerous political calculation to make, given the likely impact on tens of thousands of state employees and the average people who receive services from them.

UPDATE: I neglected to mention the other option, one that several legislative Republicans support, which is for Senate President Bob Burns to just send Gov. Jan Brewer the original budget that was adopted June 4 and dare her to veto the package. Sen. Jack Harper, R-Surprise, several times today has publicly encouraged that route, suggesting Brewer could veto two bills that include a lot of budget policies she doesn’t like, but still sign into law the basic spending framework for a $8.2 billion budget.

But that would require Brewer to accept defeat in her showdown with members of her own party. She might be willing to test her popularity versus the Legislature by vetoing the entire package and shutting down agencies that don’t have an immediate impact on public safety.

Budget deal in real trouble now

June 29th, 2009, 11:22 am by Le Templar
Sen. Sylvia Allen attempts to convince Sen. Jack Harper, kneeling on the floor, to vote for a $8.4 billion spending plan in the Senate Appropriatiions Committee on Monday. Harper and Sen. Ron Gould refused to go along, as did all the Democrats on the panel, leaving Sen. Russell Pearce, seated, chairman of the committee, without the votes for approval (Capitol Media Services photo by Howard Fischer).

Sen. Sylvia Allen attempts to convince Sen. Jack Harper, kneeling on the floor, to vote for a $8.4 billion spending plan in the Senate Appropriatiions Committee on Monday. Harper and Sen. Ron Gould refused to go along, as did all the Democrats on the panel, leaving Sen. Russell Pearce, seated, chairman of the committee, without the votes for approval (Capitol Media Services photo by Howard Fischer).

The Senate Appropriations Committee just failed to pass the main budget trailer bill, which would make changes to all of the spending appropriations adopted in the June 4 budget package. Three Republicans joined one Democrat in voting against the bill (a number of committee members seem to be absent), with Republican Sens. Ron Gould and Jack Harper saying the deal with Gov. Jan Brewer is “a step backwards” in solving the $3.3 billion deficit.

UPDATE: The Senate Appropriations Committee tried to reconsider the bill a few minutes later, but this time several absent Democrats showed up (they plan to vote against the budget deal) and Harper and Gould said they were still voting “no.” Committee chairman Russell Pearce figured out he still does not have the votes to pass the main budget bill and recessed the committee for a second time.

Perhaps it’s back to the drawing board for Brewer, Senate President Bob Burns and House Speaker Kirk Adams.

State budget countdown: Let’s try this again

June 29th, 2009, 10:22 am by Le Templar

My last post on Saturday was about how two key elements of the state budget deal between the governor and legislative leaders had stalled — the proposed statewide election on temporary sales tax increase and switching the graduated income tax to a flat rate starting in 2012. But that doesn’t mean those proposals, or the entire budget deal, are dead. Far from it.

With just one day to go before the end of the fiscal year, all eyes are on the state Senate this morning as the Appropriations Committee is scheduled to take up most of the proposed deal. But the tax elements are slated to be heard in the Senate Committee on Education Accountability and Reform. That’s because Senate Appropriations Chairman Russell Pearce, R-Mesa, refuses to consider a sales tax increase in any form, but education committee Chairman John Huppenthal, R-Chandler, has championed the flat-rate income tax proposal.

If the two Senate committees actually approve the entire budget deal, and there’s hope the full Senate will do the same, then the House Appropriations Committee can take up the tax bills this afternoon and the full House also could act on the budget sometime (late?) tonight.

If that doesn’t happen, it likely legislative leaders will try on Tuesday to push through a temporary plan to continue this fiscal year’s budget for a few weeks to avoid an immediate government shutdown. I’m not at the Capitol today, but I’ll try to keep an eye on committee hearings and any floor action through the Legislature’s popular live Web streaming.

Sales tax proposal stalls

June 27th, 2009, 5:23 pm by Le Templar

The House Appropriations Committee signed off on most of the budget deal after a nearly four-hour hearing, but NOT on the income tax flat rate or the November sales tax election. The committee adjourned without hearing those bills.

Gov. Jan Brewer has said she must have the sales tax proposal or she’s likely to veto any budget sent to her desk. But legislative Republicans don’t appear to buy the notion yet of raising any taxes now (or asking the voters to raise them) in order to lower taxes later or to get a new flat-rate income tax system. And with that, the Legislature is leaving until Monday and this edition of State Budget Countdown LIVE! is over. As a reminder, there are three days left until the end of the fiscal year and a possible government shutdown. Thanks for reading today.

Domestic partner benefits restored?

June 27th, 2009, 5:16 pm by Le Templar

Republican lawmakers have moved this year to repeal domestic partner benefits for state employees, a policy unilaterally adopted by former Gov. Janet Napolitano. Tucked into the massive budget package is a proposal to retain domestic partner benefits for existing employees but to drop such benefits for future hires.
Rep. Matt Heinz, D-Tucson, just made a motion to remove this section from the related bill, making the argument that this move would restore the domestic partners’ benefit program. Shockingly, all Republicans on the committee voted for his motion. They must believe removing that section would do something different than Heinz expects, perhaps revoking domestic partner benefits across the board?

How often is single parenting a choice?

June 27th, 2009, 5:08 pm by Le Templar

Debate in the House Appropriations Committee has been derailed for a while by a sudden clash of values related to single parents. The original issue actually dealt a budget proposal to allow the state Department of Health Services to raise licensing fees for daycare centers. But Rep. Rick Murphy, R-Glendale, raised a question related to a separate proposal to limit how often parents can receive state child-care subsidies. Murphy said he’s happy to help a young, single woman who “made a mistake” and needs help to get her life on the right track. But Murphy wants to stop supporting parents who use state subsidies on and off for years.
Rep. Kyrsten Sinema, D-Phoenix, immediately challenged Murphy’s description, saying she knows many people who either choose to be single parents or once were married and then become single parents through divorce.
After some back and forth, Murphy said Sinema had unreasonably seized on his single example. But he added that people who “choose” to be single parents should do so only if they have the right resources, and not rely on state aid.
Committee chairman John Kavanagh finally managed to get his colleagues to focus back on the bill at hand.

ADVERTISEMENT